![]()
|
Company InformationIntroductionCompany principles Certifications and qualifications Why choose BladeSec IA? News and comment < |
Products and ServicesTypical workEngaging us Specific highlights |
MoreContact usPrivacy statement Terms and conditions Environment statement Equality and diversity statement |
|
Latest news and comment.2025/04/17 - *Very* serious flaw in Fortinet devices. This has been bubbling for a while and highlights how targeted Fortinet networking kit is. Whilst it was only if you used the FortiGate SSL-VPN, Fortinet are now highlighting additional steps that are required to remove persistence in the device following patching. In other news: Signal is doing what Signal does.
2025/04/16 - And then they came for me....
2025/04/08 - Top Gun and memories.... The original Top Gun was the first film I ever watched in VHS surround sound at a friend's house. And on Sunday, I watched Top Gun: Maverick for the second time. It's odd... what got me about the opening SR-72 Darkstar sequence featuring Tom Cruise, is Maverick's lack of selfishness in trying to do his best for something bigger and the people he cares about - at his own considerable expense. It was something that I could relate to. And when Phoenix says, "Who the hell are they going to get to teach us?", it took me back 20 years when my friend and mentor at a Whitehall Department said exactly the same thing about a group (that included me) trying to improve information assurance in government. Today marks 17 years since I started as Lead Accreditor at Disclosure Scotland and I have spent that time, putting their needs above my own. In truth, I've not had a holiday in all that time where I did not speak to somebody about something related to work and looking back, probably only 20% of what I did was "assurance". The rest of it was impartially ensuring accountability, mentoring staff, offering council to seniors, monitoring elementary security controls, facilitating relationships across government, learning, and making sure that I was sure. I have spent many years at Mach 10 for the greater good. That's not just what I am. It's who I am. At the end of May, my Darkstar programme with DS ends. There will be no more anniversaries. There will be no more impartial assessment and accountability. Darkstar is a deadstick.
2025/04/07 - Snippits.
Secondly, a judge has ruled that Apple's challenge to the UK Gov's Technical Capability Notice cannot be heard in secret.
2025/03/27 - Signal-gate. Firstly, it doesn't matter what side of the Atlantic you are on, if a government forms a democracy, then that government has to be accountable and part of that is ensuring that adequate records of key decisions and the basis of those decisions is maintained. The truth is. Signal, with it's disappearing messages, may not be the best option for that. Next, we turn to reports the NSA issued about a security vulnerability in Signal. Seemingly, it was issued just shortly before Signal-gate (or depending on who you are, just afterwards). Numerous sources have reported that "the NSA had warned employees against using Signal due to a vulnerability". Well, here is a copy of that report. BladeSec IA are breaching nothing in posting a link to it - as it is "Unclassified // For Official Use Only". You will note that the "F9T53 OpSec Special Bulletin" makes no mention of any vulnerability. Instead, you'll note it highlights that bad actors consider Signal to be a "high value target" (which is true) and warns the "linked devices" feature can be misused. Ironically, it doesn't warn against ensuring that you verify the identities of those you add to chats or accept as contacts. The fact is, phishing still occurs on Signal. Indeed, it happened to me, but I did wonder why a Thai woman, with a Western name and a provocative Avatar wanted to speak to me! It's important to note, that anybody can join Signal, with just a phone number. And if you know what you're doing, you can join Signal with even less than that! This is not a flaw, but one of the reasons Signal is just so important to those who rely on privacy - not public accountability. Finally, how many other "hidden" Signal chats are going on? We, the people, demand back-door access to all unauthorised government communications using unauthorised channels to audit the compliance of those governments! Well. Maybe not.... but what does scare me is that somehow Signal will become the scapegoat for the stupidity of people who should have known better. That would be a catastrophe. Or that, given all this talk of Signal, it accelerates it's withdrawal from the UK - again because of the stupidity of people who should know better.
2025/03/13 - Speculation on an appeal by Apple. And don't let the title of this article throw you. It's a very interesting account of the Public Account Committee from Monday.
2025/03/05 - Yet more on impact the alleged Technical Capability Notice against Apple. Finally, NCSC have apparently changed their guidance for "high-risk" individuals.
2025/03/03 - More on impact of The Investigatory Powers Act. Sweden is trying to follow the example of the UK. As a consequence, Signal say they will pull out of there too. The BBC report that the Director of US National Intelligence was not informed of the UK government's request to Apple. Many commentators have pointed out that Apple have not disabled end-to-end encryption. However they have disabled Advanced Data Protection for iCloud Backups. Advanced Data Protection means that only trusted devices have access to the encryption keys. Standard data protection means that Apple has access to them and thus technically has access to material protected in this way. And that includes iCloud Drive and iCloud Backups. Access to iCloud Backups is especially concerning, as that includes a backup of your device AND a copy of your Messages. You don't need to break the end-to-end encryption, if your device is fully backed up using a mechanism that you can get access to the original content.
2025/02/21 - Apple withdraw Advanced Data Protection for UK consumers. The vast majority of people are law abiding yet the threats posed to those people by criminals and malicious foreign powers increases annually (and that includes legitimate companies who want to do stupid things*). Anything that can be done to prevent sensitive information falling into the wrong hands should be embraced and adopted. The approach, apparently taken by the UK government, highlights that they see everybody as a potential criminal who's most sensitive personal information can be mined without any recourse to proper judicial review. Whatever happened to "innocent until proven guilty?" It wasn't 1984 that Big Brother was born, it was the 21ST of February, 2025.
The thing is, I bet it will be abused by both the authorities and criminals within two years. In preference, I asked them to simply post me a cheque. Cheques, after all, have been an acceptable form of cash transfer for decades. I was told, "That's not how we pay compensation" with no further explanation offered. That is a stupid statement that makes no sense.
When I asked to have a named individual's e-mail address to send my bank details to, I was then told:- There is a massive amount of irony that the organisation refuses to use an e-mail address specific to an individual due to "internal security", but expect me to provide my specific bank details to a generic e-mail address. Here's the thing: If you replace "bank details" with "credit card details", my understanding of PCI (I am not an expert) means those details cannot be sent to a generic e-mail address, and the company must offer a secure alternative - such as an encrypted web form. The matter will get referred back to the Ombudsman at the beginning of March on the basis that the credit reference agency have failed to make good on the settlement - and then I might name names. But it does show, that even huge, international organisations with access to huge amounts of your personal data will take pointless steps to protect their staff, but still fail to protect your information to a reasonable level.
2025/02/17 - Actions that have consequences. And sometimes you need international partners to help further investigations.
2025/02/11 - Withdrawal of at risk notice: Power supply work completed.
2025/02/10 - UK Gov apparently(*) undermining Apple security. The Washington Post have reported that His Majesty's UK Government have requested Apple to backdoor their encryption. Not just for an individual, but for everybody. This is an unprecedented move in any modern democracy and represents a fundamental removal of personal rights within the UK as well as marking the UK out to be technologically repressive. This is not the sort of stance that the UK would wish to promote. It must be emphasised that the UK have previously interfered with devices to obtain prosecutions without going nuclear. The European Court of Human Rights has stated that backdoored encryption is illegal. Even more recently, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the US endorsed the use of end-to-end encryption. And those parties should know what they're speaking about; together with the UK, they comprise FIVE EYES.
El Reg's view here. Bruce Schneier's viewpoint here.
2025/02/03 - At risk notice: Power supply work. And whilst it is entirely unrelated, we have to highlight that over the weekend, it came out that Keir Starmer's personal e-mail account was hacked in 2022. Only when he recreated his account did he set up something as elementary as multi-factor authentication (MFA or 2FA). One has to ask where the Parliamentary personal security advisors were in all of this.
2025/01/29 - Poor progress in meeting UK Cyber Security Strategy. Whilst there are initiatives like GovAssure and Secure by Design, the former of those only really allows a superficial metric to be applied. It fails to understand the complexity of most wider public sector and devolved government organisations. If only there were a group of qualified, experienced individuals who understood technology, threat, risk, programme delivery, budget, data sensitivities with a governance regime that ensured accountability and could give tailored, prioritised advice...!
2025/01/27 - Holocaust Memorial Day. Back in 2017, my family and I visited the Dachau concentration camp near Munich. It was one of the first to be built and having enjoyed several days with friends immediately before, it was a horrific contrast. To this day, I remember standing in silence looking at the crematoria with silent tears rolling down my face. There is a malignant presence at these places that unless you have visited, you cannot fathom.
2025/01/27 - Apparent failure in the joiners, movers and leavers process at British Museum. The interesting thing is that the contractor entered the museum (not hard, it is a public building) but then subsequently entered a restricted area before shutting down several systems. If this isn't a demonstration of ensuring that you nail your joiners, movers and leavers process, then I don't know what is. And the key thing about the leaving part: Risk assess the circumstances:-
The sad thing is that it's usually only the "joiners" part of the process that is prioritised, as nobody likes having a new member of staff being paid, but unable to do anything because their clearance or access has not been sorted out.
2025/01/24 - Red weather warnings. The likelihood of widespread power outages highlights (for a few days of the year at least) the dangers of having a single national grid for power, heating, travel and underpinning the delivery of other critical services such as communications. When you look at the make-up of electricity generation, diversity is recognised as good - even critical to life. As changes to the climate makes storms like Éowyn more likely, house builders may have to consider delivering power and heating supply diversity. The general population may have to take more responsibility for maintaining their own habitable space. If you are in the red zone... be safe and check in with others.
2025/01/20 - UK to introduce digital driving licences. Anybody who has done anything on digital identities knows that it's inordinately difficult to get right. Physical ID needs a whole gamut of other checks and balances to verify a virtual ID. And Google is amongst the best in the world at doing it. It rather feels like doing it by a third party "government application" (that will be "secured similarly to a banking application") simply is not going to be efficient nor permit the reuse of the thinking of inordinately clever people. BBC News report here.
2025/01/08 - Mobile phones and LineageOS. For the sake of completion, I should point out that LineageOS is not for everybody. Google does a very good job of maintaining device integrity, and installing LineageOS does significantly impact on that. But if you know what you are doing, then LineageOS is truly remarkable. And in a similar note, CISA in the States has released guidance on maintaining the security of a mobile device in the face of highly targeted attacks. For those that follow mobile phone security, there's nothing new in there - but I do miss BlackBerry 7.1's resistance to sideband EMF attacks. For the general populace, there are a couple of interesting take-aways from the guidance:-
2025/01/01 - Good riddance, 2024! So instead of looking back, I'll look forward - slightly. Whilst we're not seeing Hogmanay in in our favourite place, we are going there (weather permitting!) in a couple of weeks. Suilly gets to return to his favourite beaches (we aspire to a different one every day this time) and my better half gets to run on roads that don't muddy everything (having completed Markathon for the umpteenth time). As for me, I sense that I won't be working quite so hard, and instead will be taking some "personal" time - probably sitting by a fire, with a pint of Guinness and Suilly at my feet. Casting my thoughts further forward, we hope to bring news of an event that will be strangely familiar to many of a particular age that harks back to when IA in the public sector was done with greater integrity and diligence. (And it may be prudent for me to emphasise, this is nothing to do with BladeSec IA, but in my capacity as the current Head of the Accreditation Specialism Advisory Group.) And whilst I have dwelt on the negative, there is always some time for the annual tongue-in-cheek review of the last twelve months:-
Click here for older News & Comment.
|
||||